|
We refer to photographs of children as ‘paper’ children.
They are not ‘real’ children.
Relating snips and links follow the text below.
Everyone is being just toooo protective of paper children these days. ~ Like arresting pictures will protect real children? ~ Well it’s not that simple. ~
Moreover, that kind of thinking is causing more harm than good. ~ These thoughts are to the detriment of a healthy nudist lifestyle in general and more specifically to
the rights of nudist families to own photo albums and other records of their family and children as they grow up. ~ Many nudiests even, argue against the courts who
defend our rights to these pictures, which I find totally incomprehensible.
I'm sure you know that you can go right now to several, if not many, binary groups,
and pull pictures that would make the normal person cry. ~ I have been totally destroyed seeing some of them. ~ Yeah.., in the beginning of my life online I
checked things out.., but no more. ~ The eyes are what got me most. ~ Just to think what's going on in those little minds at those times is enough to make anyone physically sick. ~ I certainly can not stop that stuff.... ~ But; at the same time, no
one can tell me the pictures we might take of our children are anywhere in that same category. ~ Do people think just plain old nudity is what we’re talking about
here? ~ If anyone thinks stopping nudists’ pictures or any non-sexual nude shots of children will protect children, they’re sadly mistaken and need to get a grip on reality.
There have always been pictures of children; clothed or not... ~ And thankfully so. ~
Children are the jewels in our lives. ~ They are the things that family albums and wonderful memories are made of. ~ They are the one and only quantity of which ‘families’ are made. ~ The nudist lifestyle changes non of this... ~ Nudist families
are still families. ~ The desire to record their children’s activities, and growing up through life, is as real and needed by those parents as it is by any others. ~ To say
that nudist parents can not nor should not take pictures of their own children is totally against the tenents of all we hold sacred and dear in this country.
Since the ‘70’s, there has been more and more awareness of the bad stuff going on
in the world. ~ And so there should be. ~ But, as with anything else, there are many who ‘over’ react. ~ They emphasise the bad instead of celibrating the good and this
subject has much more than it’s share of over reaction. ~ Hysteria. is more the word. ~ Many people today would and do just dump all ‘simple nudity’ pictures of
children into the same pot as the most depraved. ~ This, by default, includes all the treasured works that were done by all those well known photographers, artists and
illustrators throughout history. ~ It is obviously, a completely wrong way to think.
Assisting these people in their irrational view of life are a variety of cohorts. ~ There is the Radical Religious Right, the ‘RRR’. ~ Those who are never right. ~
They crank out their bile based on their damaged DNA. ~ Hereditary dementia and other mental impairments still existing throughout this country are like a pox on us;
coming from the original Puritans, Pilgrims, and other fundamental believers of sin being anywhere and everywhere. ~ Those people were kicked out of Europe and
elsewhere two hundred years ago like they got rid of all the low life in a well known science fiction book I’ve read...; the HHGTTG. ~ By sending a space ship full of
people with totally useless mentalities and occupations to another world, far away..., and programming it to crash land. ~ So our bad seeds arrived in this country in a similar manner, to grow and to spoil. ~ Unfortunately the crash landing part wasn’t
a part of it... ~ All you need to do to see the validity of this theory, is to take note of the fact that Europe and much of the rest of the civilized world suffers almost no
part of the sexual sicknesses of the mind that we do here in the U.S.
Then too, we have the glory seekers. ~ District Attorneys and the like. ~ They
need to build reputations for election time. ~ You know that elections require a lot of garbage to feed the masses. ~ Some DA’s actually earn them but this is very
difficult to do. ~ They actually have to catch a ‘guilty’ person, who is more than likely trying to avoid capture. ~ Then you need to ‘prove’ your case too?
On the other hand, many simply build phony reputations, by enforcing what they
say are laws. ~ This is where those pictures of children come into play. ~ They are useful here for them to build their ‘reputations’. ~ They attack weak opponents
such as ordinary people who are not financially or otherwise prepared to defend themselves. ~ Instead of trying to catch real criminals, they listen for brain dead
teenagers working at the corner drug store to tell them of *** c h i l d p o r n o g r a p h e r s *** wanting to get their films developed. ~ Yeah! ~ But this is just too
easy, right? ~ No sweat, plus it gets major media play. ~ But because there is no real law to nail anyone with, the DA then has to scare the poor father or mother
picture taker to death. ~ Then they offer a way out. ~ A lesser charge!!! ~ Wow! ~ What a relief. ~ ‘We’ll take it’ they say... ~ We’ll admit to anything that doesn’t
get us a lawyer’s bill or time in jail. ~ They confess to some crime they didn’t commit.
So the ‘prosecutors’ make it appear they are doing something good for society as
they work to destroy it. ~ A crime was committed all right.., but by the DA, not the parent.
Perhaps the most unfortunate cohort of all are the nudists themselves. ~ Many nudists actually worry that paper children might be used ‘sexually’, and so they
should not be taken in the first place. ~ Simply to prevent them from *somehow* falling into the wrong hands. ~ Excuse me? ~ That is totally insane. ~ Aren’t you
forgetting all those ‘right’ hands they won’t be reaching either? ~ Ours? ~ Too many people seem willing to give up our rights just for the inane reason of ‘maybe’
keeping a ‘piece of paper’ out of the hands of people they don’t want to have it. ~ So I guess it’s better if *everyone* loses, eh? ~ Where some people get their ideas from is way beyond me...
Adults who believe paper children are real live children really need to get a grip on
themselves. ~ Pictures of nudist children are simple pieces of paper or with some ink or dyes applied. ~ Just pieces of paper folks... ~ That’s all. ~ The child doesn’t know or feel a thing if you touch their picture.
Just think about it. ~ Who should care if these pictures distracted weirdo's for a while? ~ For any amount of time? ~ Let them buy all our magazines that they want.
~ They’re legal. ~ Let them spend all the time they want looking at them..., by themselves. ~ If you exchange the thinking of ‘weirdos’ and ‘paper children’ with
'normal men’ and 'Playboy', it amounts to about the same thing, doesn’t it? ~ No harm done. ~ So what that ‘seeing is relieving’. ~ Isn’t it better that they are? ~
Instead of having them go looking for non-paper children?
If you fear that your pictures might be mistaken for the bad stuff for some reason,
just don't take them to any corner drugstore for processing so that pathetic clerk can think they need to save your children from you. ~ But don’t give up taking the
pictures out of fear of prosecution either. ~ It isn't going to happen. ~ Yes people get hit by lightning, but we still go out in the storms. ~ Nudists have won these cases
in court and you'll only hate yourself in later years if you allow yourself to live in fear now.
There are *many* stories on the net about those who have been ‘arrested’ and then
given the ability to ‘cop a plea’. ~ There are very *few* where you see an actual conviction of anyone on a major offense. ~ You accepting a plea bargain is the DA’s only means of a conviction. ~ That’s why they offer them. ~ They cannot win
on the original charge. ~ If they thought they could, they would. ~ But still, there are many who are faced with heavy lawyers fees, potential heavy penalties, etc. who
take that way out. ~ They should actually ‘outlaw’ the offering of plea bargains. ~ They are only designed to perpetuate the harassment of innocent people.
Here is what happens when you cop a plea.
When you accept a plea bargain, you will (likely) be dropped from a felony to a
misdemeanor, but instead of getting proven innocent of the felony, you will be admitting doing something wrong that you did not do. ~ You will be a first offender
so you will then be given a fine and/or warning and/or probation. ~ You will have a record and you will need to walk on eggs for many long years, if not the rest of your
life; even after probation. ~ You will not be able to conduct your life as you previously lived it. ~ If that means simply taking pictures for the family album or in
more of a professional manner such as artist, photographer, etc. ~ You may possibly lose much more income over time than what a lawyer would have cost. ~ You will
need to forever limit your activities for fear of being placed in that same position a second time, via the same means. ~ Because of your previous acceptance of a plea
bargain, there will be none offered the second time. ~ You be prosecuted as a felon if the DA feels he has sufficient cause. ~ That means, if you know the pictures in question this time are totally innocent, you need to put your trust in them and go
with them. ~ They are the only things you can be prosecuted on. ~ Do not expect anything that may occur in the future to be seen as innocent as these are now. ~ It
only takes an inadvertant twist of the body, a special glance, or what have you, to give future pictures a more suggestive appearance. ~ Don’t trust how they will ‘turn out’ at the photo finishers on any future shootings.
The pictures you have *now* will be their entire case against you. ~ They are all
that they can convict you on and they must proven to be against the law as it is described. ~ If they’re not, they’re not.
If you do not accept a plea and do not admit to doing anything wrong, they cannot
prosecute you on simple nudity, innocent pictures. ~ Not even something they may call ‘bad taste’. ~ Bad taste is not illegal. ~ If they try to infer that you should have
known they were in *bad taste*, or anything less than the worse terms possible, you will know you have already won.
As long as you honestly know the pictures are innocent, and you fight it, they will
back down. ~ Even if they do not, and you lose, you will still be a first timer and the judge will very likely ‘go easy’ on you. ~ He will fine and/or warn and/or put you on
probation. ~ Nothing more than if you had accepted a plea.
It you fall for their ‘copping a plea’ bit, you will be playing right into their hands. ~
That is the ONLY way they can get anything on you. ~ If you confess to doing ‘something’ wrong, on your own!! ~ Then they can prosecute you.
|
